Jump to content

D'Onofrio model (binary variant): Difference between revisions

From mintOC
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 32: Line 32:
The parameters and scenarios are as in [[D'Onofrio_chemotherapy_model]], the new fixed parameters are
The parameters and scenarios are as in [[D'Onofrio_chemotherapy_model]], the new fixed parameters are


<math>(c_{0,1},c_{0,2},c_{0,3},c_{0,4})=(u_0^{max},u_0^{max},0,0),
<math>(c_{0,1},c_{0,2},c_{0,3},c_{0,4})=(u_0^{max},u_0^{max},0,0), \qquad
(c_{1,1},c_{1,2},c_{1,3},c_{1,4})=(0,u_0^{max},u_0^{max},0).
(c_{1,1},c_{1,2},c_{1,3},c_{1,4})=(0,u_1^{max},u_1^{max},0).
</math>
</math>


== Reference Solutions ==
== Reference Solutions ==


If the problem is relaxed, i.e., we demand that <math>w(t)</math> be in the continuous interval <math>[0, 1]</math> instead of the binary choice <math>\{0,1\}</math>, the optimal solution can be determined by means of direct optimal control.  
If the problem is relaxed, i.e., we demand that <math>w(t)</math> be in the continuous interval <math>[0, 1]</math> instead of the binary choice <math>\{0,1\}</math>, the optimal solution can be determined by using a direct method such as collocation or Bock's direct multiple shooting method.
 
 
The optimal objective value of scenario 2  of the relaxed problem with  <math> n_t=6000, \, n_u=100  </math> is <math>19.3561387</math>. The objective value of the binary controls obtained by Combinatorial Integral Approimation (CIA) is <math>169.45773</math>.  The binary control solution was evaluated in the MIOCP by using a Merit function with additional Mayer term
<math> 100 \max\limits_{t\in[0,1]}\{0,x_2(t)-x_2^{max}\}+1000 \max\limits_{t\in[0,1]}\{0,x_3(t)-x_3^{max}\}  </math>.


The optimal objective value of the relaxed problem with  <math> n_t=6000, \, n_u=60  </math> is <math>1.30167235</math>. The objective value of the binary controls obtained by Combinatorial Integral Approimation (CIA) is <math>1.30273681</math>. 


<gallery caption="Reference solution plots" widths="180px" heights="140px" perrow="2">
<gallery caption="Reference solution plots" widths="180px" heights="140px" perrow="2">
Line 52: Line 55:


Model description is available in
Model description is available in
* [[:Category:AMPL | AMPL code]] at [[Van der Pol Oscillator binary variant(AMPL)]]
* [[:Category:AMPL | AMPL code]] at [[D'Onofrio model, binary variant (AMPL)]]





Revision as of 14:38, 11 January 2018

D'Onofrio model (binary variant)
State dimension: 1
Differential states: 4
Discrete control functions: 4
Path constraints: 2

This site describes a D'Onofrio model variant with four binary controls instead which of only two continuous controls. The continuous controls are replaced via the outer convexifacation method.

Mathematical formulation

For t[t0,tf] the optimal control problem is given by

minx,ux0(tf)+αt0tfu0(t)2dts.t.x˙0=ζx0ln(x0x1)i=14wic1,iFx0,x˙1=bx0μx1dx023x1i=14wic0,iGx1i=14wic1,iηx1,x˙2=i=14wic0,i,x˙3=i=14wic1,i,[1.5ex]x2x2max,x3x3max,1=i=14wi(t),wi(t){0,1},i=14.


Parameters

The parameters and scenarios are as in D'Onofrio_chemotherapy_model, the new fixed parameters are

(c0,1,c0,2,c0,3,c0,4)=(u0max,u0max,0,0),(c1,1,c1,2,c1,3,c1,4)=(0,u1max,u1max,0).

Reference Solutions

If the problem is relaxed, i.e., we demand that w(t) be in the continuous interval [0,1] instead of the binary choice {0,1}, the optimal solution can be determined by using a direct method such as collocation or Bock's direct multiple shooting method.


The optimal objective value of scenario 2 of the relaxed problem with nt=6000,nu=100 is 19.3561387. The objective value of the binary controls obtained by Combinatorial Integral Approimation (CIA) is 169.45773. The binary control solution was evaluated in the MIOCP by using a Merit function with additional Mayer term 100maxt[0,1]{0,x2(t)x2max}+1000maxt[0,1]{0,x3(t)x3max}.



Source Code

Model description is available in