Jump to content

Control of Heat Equation with Actuator Placement: Difference between revisions

From mintOC
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
The constraints are a source budget, which limits the quantity of placed actuators, and the two-dimensional heat equation with some source function.
The constraints are a source budget, which limits the quantity of placed actuators, and the two-dimensional heat equation with some source function.
Additionally, we assume Dirichlet boundary conditions and initial conditions.
Additionally, we assume Dirichlet boundary conditions and initial conditions.
Originally, the problem formulation was non-convex.
We overcome this issue by substitution of $v(t)w_l(t)$ by $v_l(t)$ and adding the Big $M$ formulation \eqref{Eq:BigM}.





Revision as of 16:29, 23 February 2016

Control of Heat Equation with Actuator Placement
State dimension: 1
Differential states: 1
Continuous control functions: 9
Discrete control functions: 9
Path constraints: 3
Interior point equalities: 2


This problem is governed by the heat equation and is adapted from Iftime and Demetriou ([Iftime2009]Author: Orest V. Iftime; Michael A. Demetriou
Journal: {A}utomatica
Number: 2
Pages: 312--323
Title: {O}ptimal control of switched distributed parameter systems with spatially scheduled actuators
Volume: 45
Year: 2009
Link to Google Scholar
). Its goal is to choose a place to apply an actuator in a given area depending on time. The objective function is quadratic, its first term captures the desired final state u¯0, the second term regularize the state over time and the third term regularize the continuous controls. The constraints are a source budget, which limits the quantity of placed actuators, and the two-dimensional heat equation with some source function. Additionally, we assume Dirichlet boundary conditions and initial conditions. Originally, the problem formulation was non-convex. We overcome this issue by substitution of $v(t)w_l(t)$ by $v_l(t)$ and adding the Big $M$ formulation \eqref{Eq:BigM}.


Mathematical formulation

minu,v,wJ(u,v)=||u(,,tf)||2,Ω2+2||u(,,)||2,Ω×T2+1500l=1L||vl()||2,T2 s.t.ut(x,y,t)κΔu(x,y,t)=l=19vl(t)fl(x,y) in Ω×Tu(x,y,t)=0 on Ω×Tu(x,y,0)=100sin(πx)sin(πy) in ΩMwl(t)vl(t)Mwl(t) for all l{1,,L} in Tl=1Lwl(t)=W in Twl(t){0,1} for all l{1,,L} in T.

Parameters

We define the source term for all locations l{1,,L} and a fix parameter ε+: fl(x,y)=12πεe((xlx)2+(yly)2)2ε where (xl,yl) is the coordinate of the mesh point of the lth possible actuator location.

The parameters used are:

Ω=[0,1]×[0,2],L=9,κ=0.01,tf=10,W=1,ε=0.01.


The parameter κ describes the thermal dissipativity of the material in the domain Ω, it may vary in space: κ(x,y). The parameter L indicates the number of possible actuator locations. They are distributed as indicated in the picture. The source budget is limited by W.

Reference solution

Source Code

References

[Iftime2009]Orest V. Iftime; Michael A. Demetriou (2009): {O}ptimal control of switched distributed parameter systems with spatially scheduled actuators . {A}utomatica, 45, 312--323Link to Google Scholar