Exponential OED: Difference between revisions
RobertLampel (talk | contribs) |
RobertLampel (talk | contribs) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
situation is different, due to the decoupling of the integration | situation is different, due to the decoupling of the integration | ||
<gallery caption="Reference solution plots" widths=" | <gallery caption="Reference solution plots" widths="500px" heights="300px" perrow="1"> | ||
Image: | Image:Exponential_OED.png| Left: State variable x(·). Right: Sensitivity G(·). Top row shows initialization of multiple shooting variables at constant values <math>x(t_i) = 2, \ G(t_i) = 10^{-3}</math>. Note that the solution to the initial value problem on <math>[0, 0.6]</math> with <math>x(t_0) = q = 2</math> does not exist, hence the single shooting approach will fail. The bottom row shows the converged solution. | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
== Miscellaneous and Further Reading == | == Miscellaneous and Further Reading == | ||
The Toy OED problem was introduced by | The Toy OED problem was introduced by Körkel et al. in [[#Koerkel | [1]]], which contains further details. | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
< | <span id="Koerkel2000">[1]</span> "A Multiple Shooting Formulation for Optimum Experimental Design" by S. Körkel, A. Potschka, H.G. Bock, and Sebastian Sager <br> | ||
<!--List of all categories this page is part of. List characterization of solution behavior, model properties, ore presence of implementation details (e.g., AMPL for AMPL model) here --> | <!--List of all categories this page is part of. List characterization of solution behavior, model properties, ore presence of implementation details (e.g., AMPL for AMPL model) here --> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:44, 28 November 2025
| Exponential OED | |
|---|---|
| State dimension: | 1 |
| Differential states: | 2 |
| Discrete control functions: | 1 |
The Exponential OED problem was formulated as minimal design problem that to highlight one important difference between single and multiple shooting. We are interested in finding an optimal experimental design to determine the parameter in a one-dimensional ODE model, where can directly measure the single state.
The optimal integer control functions shows bang bang behavior.
Mathematical formulation
For a single parameter the original initial value problem is given by
We furthermore restrict the state to be in the interval . We assume that we have one measurement at the end time point . This allows to eliminate sampling function directly from the control problem and to use the objective function
Applying our transformation, we obtain the following experimental design control problem:
Parameters
These fixed values are used within the model:
Reference Solutions
As can be seen, the optimal solution will maximize the value of and hence also of . For the optimal initial value is given by leading to state values of and and an objective value of . The main problem with direct single shooting is that a large part of the feasible domain of will cause the integrator to run into a singularity before . Hence only initial guesses for the optimization variable that are below a critical value of will give rise to a successful optimization. For multiple shooting the situation is different, due to the decoupling of the integration
- Reference solution plots
-
Left: State variable x(·). Right: Sensitivity G(·). Top row shows initialization of multiple shooting variables at constant values . Note that the solution to the initial value problem on with does not exist, hence the single shooting approach will fail. The bottom row shows the converged solution.
Miscellaneous and Further Reading
The Toy OED problem was introduced by Körkel et al. in [1], which contains further details.
References
[1] "A Multiple Shooting Formulation for Optimum Experimental Design" by S. Körkel, A. Potschka, H.G. Bock, and Sebastian Sager